Start to read the blog of Robert Paul wolff. Start to watch his lectures on Kant.

videoblog
part 1Reading the Critique Part I
part 2reading the Critique Part II
part 3reading the Critique Part III
part 4reading the Critique part IV
part 5reading the Critique part V
part 6reading the Critique part VI
part 7reading the Critique part VII
part 8reading the critique part VIII
part 9reading the Critique part IX

From the wiki page: Kant builds on the work of empiricist philosophers such as John Locke and David Hume, as well as rationalist philosophers such as Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz and Christian Wolff. He expounds new ideas on the nature of space and time, and tries to provide solutions to the skepticism of Hume regarding knowledge of the relation of cause and effect and that of René Descartes regarding knowledge of the external world. This is argued through the transcendental idealism of objects (as appearance) and their form of appearance. Kant regards the former “as mere representations and not as things in themselves”, and the latter as “only sensible forms of our intuition, but not determinations given for themselves or conditions of objects as things in themselves”. This grants the possibility of a priori knowledge, since objects as appearance “must conform to our cognition…which is to establish something about objects before they are given to us.” Knowledge independent of experience Kant calls “a priori” knowledge, while knowledge obtained through experience is termed “a posteriori”.[2] According to Kant, a proposition is a priori if it is necessary and universal. A proposition is necessary if it is not false in any case and so cannot be rejected; rejection is contradiction. A proposition is universal if it is true in all cases, and so does not admit of any exceptions. Knowledge gained a posteriori through the senses, Kant argues, never imparts absolute necessity and universality, because it is possible that we might encounter an exception.

Alex Campbell’s youtube

notes

  • background for The Critique of Pure Reason

there was a great debate between Rationalists and Empiricists about a wide range of questions, including the nature of space and time, whether reason or sensibility is the source of human knowledge, and the scope, limits, even the possibility of such knowledge. On the rationalist side, there are Decartes, Leibniz, and Christian Wolff. On the empiricist side, there are British philosophers, Locke, Berkeley, and Hume. So it is a debate between Continental Rationalists and British Empiricists.

The Inaugural Dissertation of 1770 was Kant’s attempt to resolve the dispute between Rationalism and Empiricism.

TODO: part3

references

  • Norman Kemp Smith, Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason, English translation.
  • Robert Paul wolff, Kant’s Theory of Mental Activity, 1963.
  • Peter Strawson, The Bounds of Sense